Sedition law “colonial”, was meant to suppress freedom movement: SC
Team Udayavani, Jul 15, 2021, 12:00 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern over the misuse of “colonial-era” penal law on sedition and sought response of the Centre on pleas including the one filed by the Editors Guild of India challenging the validity of the provision.
A bench headed by Chief justice N V Ramana said the main concern was about the “misuse of law”, and asked as to why the Centre, which is repealing stale laws, was not getting rid of this provision.
The sedition law was meant to suppress the freedom movement and was used by the Britishers to silence Mahatma Gandhi and others, the court noted.
Some guidelines may be laid down to curb misuse of sedition law, Attorney General K K Venugopal said while defending the validity of the provision.
The bench was hearing a fresh plea by former army officer Major-General S G Vombatkere (Retd) challenging the Constitutional validity of section 124 A (sedition) of the IPC on grounds that it causes a “chilling effect” on speech and is an unreasonable restriction on free expression, a fundamental right.
Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.
Top News
Related Articles More
SC transfers cheating case against choreographer Remo D’Souza to Delhi court
Fishing vessel collides with naval platform off Goa coast; 2 fishermen missing
Cal HC stays demolition of illegal constructions in Mandarmoni
Delhi LG praises CM Atishi, calls her ‘thousand times better than her predecessor’
Kharge confident of Cong and allies coming to power in Maharashtra, Jharkhand
MUST WATCH
Latest Additions
SC transfers cheating case against choreographer Remo D’Souza to Delhi court
Fishing vessel collides with naval platform off Goa coast; 2 fishermen missing
BGT Day 1: Bumrah leads India’s spectacular bowling comeback after batting no-show
Cal HC stays demolition of illegal constructions in Mandarmoni
Delhi LG praises CM Atishi, calls her ‘thousand times better than her predecessor’
Thanks for visiting Udayavani
You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.
To continue reading, please turn it off or whitelist Udayavani.