Workman cannot be dismissed during pendency of dispute proceedings: K’taka HC


PTI, Mar 3, 2023, 10:23 AM IST

The High Court of Karnataka has ordered the reinstatement of a workman with backwages who was dismissed from service while there was an ongoing dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act between him and the company.

The HC upheld a Labour Court order and said, “The Labour Court having decided the issue by taking note the fact of the workman having been dismissed from service during the pendency of the proceedings before it, no justification having been made as regards the order of dismissal, the Labour Court has rightly come to a conclusion that the dismissal was improper and directed the reinstatement of the workman with backwages.”

The HC single-judge bench of Justice Suraj Govindaraj also said when there is a dispute before a Labour Court, it has the powers to decide all matters including setting aside orders of dismissal.

“When disputes are pending before the Labour Court, the Labour Court could adjudicate all incidental matters relating thereto and relating to the industrial dispute which could include the setting aside the order of dismissal directing the reinstatement and ordering the backwages,” it said.

The dispute was between Mulberry Silks Ltd (Earlier known as Mulberry Silk International Ltd) and N G Chowdappa, an employee.

A “domestic” enquiry against Chowdappa found him guilty of misconduct and he was dismissed from service on August 6, 2003. Chowdappa and four other employees who were dismissed, challenged this before the Labour Court.

While the case was pending, the other workmen settled their claim with the company in 2008.

The Labour Court case continued only with regard to Chowdappa. It allowed his application ordering for his reinstatement on August 27, 2009. The company challenged this before the HC in 2009 and the Court gave its judgment on February 20, 2023.

“The dismissal of the respondent (Chowdappa) when the dispute was pending is a clear violation of Sub-Section (2) of Section 33 of the Act entitling such workmen to continue to be in employment notwithstanding the order of dismissal or discharge. Without such permission having been sought for and obtained, the order of dismissal is to be treated non-est and never to have been passed,” the Judgment said.

Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.

Top News

Essar Group co-founder Shashi Ruia dies at 80

Battle royal at Udaipur palace after BJP’s Vishvaraj Singh denied entry over family feud

RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das hospitalised

Had to sell land to realise dream: Vaibhav’s father

Eligible families won’t be inconvenienced with BPL card revision: Karnataka minister Muniyappa

Boy chokes to death after eating more than three pooris together

PWD, Google Maps officials booked in Bareilly bridge death case

Related Articles More

Cabinet expansion in Karnataka? Aspirants lobby intensely

‘Allow teachers to discipline students’: Letter to CM Siddaramaiah

Eligible families won’t be inconvenienced with BPL card revision: Karnataka minister Muniyappa

Karnataka: BJP to begin official campaign on Waqf issue from December 4

Geethartha Chinthane 105: Shoka and Dukha are not same

MUST WATCH

Coconut Flower

Prakash Belawadi

Naxal Leader Vikram Gowda

Christmas Cake Fruit Mixing

DK Shivakumar


Latest Additions

President Murmu pays homage to bravehearts who lost lives in Mumbai terror attack

Essar Group co-founder Shashi Ruia dies at 80

PM Modi greets people on Samvidhan Divas

Sensex, Nifty climb in early trade amid fresh foreign fund inflows

Amur falcon bird radio tagged in Manipur reaches Kenya

Thanks for visiting Udayavani

You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.
To continue reading, please turn it off or whitelist Udayavani.