Ayodhya Verdict Live Updates: Alternate Land to be given to Muslims

Team Udayavani, Nov 9, 2019, 10:59 AM IST

Highlights from the verdict:

• SC asks Centre to consider granting some kind of representation to Nirmohi Akhara in setting up of trust.
• Centre, UP govt can monitor together future actions by authorities: SC.
• Possession of disputed 2.77 acre land will remain with Central government receiver: SC
• SC dismisses plea of Nirmohi Akhara seeking control of entire disputed land.
• SC asks centre to frame scheme within 3 months and set up a trust for construction of a temple.
• SC directs allotment of alternative land to Muslims to build new mosque.
• Damage to Babri mosque was violation of law: SC.
• On the contrary, Hindus established their case that they were in possession of outer courtyard: SC.
• UP Sunni Central Waqf Board has failed to establish its case in Ayodhya dispute: SC.
• Muslims were not in possession of outer courtyard of the site: SC.
• Muslims have not adduced evidence they were in exclusive possession of dispute site: SC.
• Iron railing was set up at site in 1856-1857, it suggests Hindus kept worshipping at the site: SC.
• Despite obstruction caused in offering prayers at Mosque, evidence suggest that there was no abandonment: SC.
• Evidence suggest Muslims offered Friday prayers at mosque which indicates they have not lost possession: SC.
• Extensive nature of Hindus worshipping at outer courtyard at site has been there: SC.
• Evidence suggest Hindus were in possession of outer court yard, says SC.
• Title cannot be established on ground of faith, belief; they are kind of indicator for deciding dispute: SC.
• The existence of Sita Rasoi, Ram Chabutra and Bhandar grih are the testimony of the religious fact of the place: SC.
• Faith of Hindus that Lord Rama was born at demolished structure is undisputed: SC.
• Hindus consider this place as birthplace of lord Ram, even Muslims say this about disputed place: SC.
• ASI had not established whether temple was demolished to build the mosque.
• The underlying structure was not an Islamic structure.
• The fact that there lied a temple beneath the destroyed structure has been established by the ASI: SC.
• Babri mosque was not built on vacant land: SC.
• SC lends credence to the archeological evidence on the disputed site.
• SC says that terming the archeological evidence as merely an opinion would be a great disservice to the ASI.
• SC now refers the content of the lawsuit of devotee Gopal Singh Visharad seeking right to worship at the site.
• SC holds that Nirmohi Akhara’s suit is barred by limitation, not a Shebait or devotee of deity Ram Lalla.
• SC says that the disputed land was the government land in the revenue records.
• Shia Waqf board’s claim was over the disputed structure which is dismissed by SC.
• SC dismisses the appeal of Shia Waqf Board appeal, pronounces a unanimous verdict in the case.