Rape case an attempt to hijack “Me Too movement”: Kashyap


Team Udayavani, Oct 2, 2020, 1:24 PM IST

Mumbai: Filmmaker Anurag Kashyap has categorically denied rape allegations levelled by actor Payal Ghosh and sought “sever action” against her for “hijacking” the “Me Too movement”, his lawyer said on Friday.

The suburban Versova police registered a First Information Report (FIR) against Kashyap (48) on September 22 after Ghosh, in a compliant, alleged that he had raped her in 2013.

Kashyap has categorically denied that any such alleged incident ever took place, his lawyer Priyanka Khimani said in a statement.

The police have invoked IPC sections 376 (I) (rape), 354 (assault on woman with intent to outrage her modesty), 341 (wrongful restraint) and 342 (wrongful confinement) in the case.

Kashyap was on Thursday questioned by the police in connection with the rape case for nearly eight hours.

The director-producer has sought “severe action” against the actor for misusing the criminal justice system and for “hijacking” the “Me Too Movement” for ulterior motives, the lawyer said in the statement.

The statement said Kashyap has provided documentary proof to the police to establish that throughout August 2013, when the alleged crime took place, he was away in Sri Lanka in connection with a film shoot.

It demonstrates that the compliant of the actress is an “outright lie”, she added.

The lawyer claimed that belated allegations have been widely publicised by Ghosh for the purpose of “vilifying” Kashyap.

The film-maker is confident that “falsity of the complaint has been exposed,” not only by the evidence presented by him, but also the ever-shifting version of events put forth by Ghosh in the media, Khimani said.

As per the statement, Kashyap intends to vigorously pursue the legal remedies available to him.

Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.

Top News

Like UP, bring BJP to power in Jharkhand to ‘bulldoze’ mafia: Yogi at Koderma poll rally

Govt asks Wikipedia why it should not be treated as publisher instead of intermediary

SC upholds validity of UP madrassa law, says it does not violate principle of secularism

Bantwal: Theft at Shree Mahalingeshwar temple

States not empowered to take over all private properties for distribution to serve common good: SC

Chhattisgarh NAN ‘scam’: FIR against 2 retired IAS officers, former AG

Davangere: MLA Basavantappa returns Rs 1.2 lakh left behind at shop

Related Articles More

Salman Khan gets another threat, asked to cough up Rs 5 cr

Actress Kasthuri stokes controversy by her remarks on Telugu-speaking people in TN

Tom Holland says he Googles partner Zendaya ‘to see if everything’s good’

Renowned Sandalwood director Guruprasad found dead

Shah Rukh Khan turns 59, fans wait outside Mannat to catch superstar’s glimpse

MUST WATCH

Gho Pooja in Deepavali Festival

Melukote Deepavali

Ganapathi Co-operative Society Ltd

Udayavani Chinnara Banna 2024

Annapoorna Aahar | Food Places In Mysore


Latest Additions

Like UP, bring BJP to power in Jharkhand to ‘bulldoze’ mafia: Yogi at Koderma poll rally

Govt asks Wikipedia why it should not be treated as publisher instead of intermediary

MUDA Case: K’taka HC adjourns hearing to November 26

SC upholds validity of UP madrassa law, says it does not violate principle of secularism

Union Minister H D Kumaraswamy booked for threatening police officer

Thanks for visiting Udayavani

You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.
To continue reading, please turn it off or whitelist Udayavani.