Ayodhya case: Questions asked only to us, not to Hindu side, Muslim parties allege in SC


PTI, Oct 14, 2019, 2:34 PM IST

New Delhi: Muslim parties alleged before the Supreme Court on Monday that questions are asked only from them and not posed to the Hindu side in the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi land dispute case at Ayodhya.

This comment was made by senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the Muslim parties, before a 5-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

“Your Lordship didn’t ask question to the other side. All the questions have been asked to us only. Of course, we are answering them.” Dhavan told the bench on the 38th day of the crucial hearing in the case.

The submission was vehemently opposed by senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan, representing deity ‘Ram Lalla’, who said: “This is totally unwarranted”.

Dhavan’s remark came when the bench, which also comprises justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer, said that the idea behind erecting iron railing at the disputed site was to separate the inner courtyard from the outer courtyard.

By putting up an iron railing, the idea was to separate Hindus and Muslims and it was to appreciate the fact that Hindus were offering prayers in the outer-courtyard where ‘Ram Chabutra’, ‘Sita Rasoi’, ‘Bhandar Grih’ were situated, the court said.

The bench also took note of Dhavan’s submissions that the Hinuds only had “prescriptive right” to enter and offer prayer at the site and it does not mean that they had ownership claim over the disputed property.

As you say they had the right to pray and enter, does it not dilute your right to ownership, the bench asked, adding in case of “exclusive ownership” over a property, can a third person be allowed entry and prayer right.

The protracted hearing in the case has entered the crucial final leg on Monday as the top court resumed proceedings on the 38th day after the week-long Dussehra break.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.

Top News

Rafi@100: When Amitabh Bachchan paid tribute to Mohammed Rafi in 1990 movie ‘Kroadh’

Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail to Puja Khedkar in UPSC cheating case

Sindhu marries Venkat Datta at Udaipur in a private ceremony

Today’s Cong is ‘duplicate Congress’ led by ‘fake Gandhis’, claims Union Minister Pralhad Joshi

Ahead of Delhi polls, Kejriwal helps women, elderly register for welfare schemes

Cong presses for Shah resignation over Ambedkar remark, announces protests against ‘anti-Dalit’ BJP

Mumbra woman gets life in jail for killing son’s wife, his mother-in-law

Related Articles More

Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail to Puja Khedkar in UPSC cheating case

Newly recruited Meitei, Kuki personnel in Manipur police to be posted together: CM Biren Singh

Today’s Cong is ‘duplicate Congress’ led by ‘fake Gandhis’, claims Union Minister Pralhad Joshi

Ahead of Delhi polls, Kejriwal helps women, elderly register for welfare schemes

Union minister condemns disruption of Christmas celebration in Kerala school

MUST WATCH

Tulunadu Daivaradane

Feeding Birds with Creative Paddy Art!

Areca Nut

HOTEL SRI DURGA BHAVANA

Harish Poonja


Latest Additions

Rafi@100: When Amitabh Bachchan paid tribute to Mohammed Rafi in 1990 movie ‘Kroadh’

Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail to Puja Khedkar in UPSC cheating case

Sindhu marries Venkat Datta at Udaipur in a private ceremony

Tanush Kotian replaces recently retired Ashwin in India’s squad

Newly recruited Meitei, Kuki personnel in Manipur police to be posted together: CM Biren Singh

Thanks for visiting Udayavani

You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.
To continue reading, please turn it off or whitelist Udayavani.