Karnataka HC slams delay in trial in POCSO case


PTI, Sep 14, 2024, 2:38 PM IST

The Karnataka High Court has said that the entire criminal justice system was put to shame as the trial in a case of rape and murder of a five-year-old girl has been pending for the past seven years.

The Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, specifically mandates conclusion of the trial within a year, as far as possible.

The High Court observed that delay in such cases, where the offences are heinous based on facts that are ‘horrendous’, is a sad reflection of the legal and judicial system.

It also pointed out that though Section 35(2) of the POCSO Act mandates completion within one year, there are many cases pending before the trial courts concerned.

Justice M Nagaprasanna made these observations while stating that though cognisance in the criminal case was taken against the two accused persons in 2017 itself, the offenders are yet to be brought to justice.

One of the accused, Chandana, had moved the High Court for recalling nine witnesses for cross-examination on the ground that the trial court rejected the application, even though the accused’s advocate could not cross-examine the witnesses citing ill health.

However, the High Court noticed from the records that one of the reasons for the delay was due to repeated filing of applications on behalf of the petitioner for recalling witnesses for further cross-examination.

Based on this finding, the court permitted recalling of nine witnesses, as the right of their cross-examination was not availed by the accused, with a condition that cross-examination should be completed within nine days, and the entire trial should be completed within three months from the date of completion of cross-examination.

Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.

Top News

From reel to real: Drug smuggler caught from theatre during ‘Pushpa 2’ show

Boxing Day Test: Fans wait for Kohli’s ‘Kingly’ outing at MCG

BJP MPs did not mention Indira herself voted to remove many provisions of 42nd Amendment: Ramesh

Puttur: Dinesh Gundu Rao highlights success of Home Health Scheme in Kolar, plans statewide expansion

Mangaluru: MP Brijesh Chowta emphasizes need for NIA in coastal Karnataka

Siblings wanting to postpone exams behind bomb threats to Delhi schools

India can never permit others to have veto on its choices: EAM Jaishankar

Related Articles More

Geethartha Chinthane 132: Philosophy is not for preaching but for practice

Puttur: Dinesh Gundu Rao highlights success of Home Health Scheme in Kolar, plans statewide expansion

Puttur: Three women arrested for gold theft at two locations

Mumtaz Ali Suicide Case: Bail plea hearing adjourned

Mangaluru: MP Brijesh Chowta emphasizes need for NIA in coastal Karnataka

MUST WATCH

Tulunadu Daivaradane

Feeding Birds with Creative Paddy Art!

Areca Nut

HOTEL SRI DURGA BHAVANA

Harish Poonja


Latest Additions

From reel to real: Drug smuggler caught from theatre during ‘Pushpa 2’ show

Boxing Day Test: Fans wait for Kohli’s ‘Kingly’ outing at MCG

Modi govt’s ‘calibrated erosion’ of EC’s integrity: Kharge on election rule

PM Modi in Kuwait meets translator, publisher of Mahabharata, Ramayana in Arabic

BJP MPs did not mention Indira herself voted to remove many provisions of 42nd Amendment: Ramesh

Thanks for visiting Udayavani

You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.
To continue reading, please turn it off or whitelist Udayavani.