Political parties under RTI: CIC puts matter in ‘abeyance’


Team Udayavani, Apr 2, 2017, 11:43 AM IST

New Delhi: Chief Information Commissioner R K Mathur has directed to keep “in abeyance” the matter pertaining to political parties not adhering to the Right To Information Act, thus putting the controversial issue in cold storage.

The note, in this regard, was issued after Bimal Julka, one of the members of the bench hearing the case, recused himself on December 23, 2016.

“Till the bench is reconstituted or a decision taken on IC (BJ) note, the proceedings may temporarily remain in abeyance,” Mathur had stated on December 29, 2016.

Nearly three months later, there is no word on replacement of Julka in the bench and the matter hangs in a limbo.

The file notings have now been disclosed by the Central Information Commission under the Right to Information (RTI) Act to activist R K Jain, who had filed a complaint against political parties.

Mathur’s direction to keep the hearing in abeyance comes in spite of a 2014 order of the Delhi High Court to the Commission to decide within six months the complaint filed by Jain.

The activist has alleged that the parties were not replying to RTI applications and have not put in place any infrastructure mandated under the RTI Act.

Six national parties including BJP, Congress, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP were brought under the ambit of the RTI Act by a Full Bench of the Commission on June 3, 2013.

This order was neither challenged in a High Court nor changed but the political parties have refused to entertain the RTI applications directed at them.

Jain used section 18 of the RTI Act which allows a petitioner to file a case against a public authority if his application is not responded to within 30 days or if the public authority has not put in place mandatory infrastructure to handle the applications.

The Commission under this mechanism can slap a penalty, maximum of Rs 25,000, on the public authority if it is reasonably satisfied about the guilt of the authority.

The complaint of Jain against political parties was being heard by a Full Bench comprising of Information Commissioners Sridhar Acharyulu, Sudhir Bhargava and Bimal Julka.

The bench started hearing the case on July 22, 2016 and within six months, Julka abruptly recused himself from the bench citing work in his own registry.

Udayavani is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest news.

Top News

Women centric schemes game-changer for Maharashtra, Jharkhand?

AR Rahman sends notice to ‘slanderers’ over speculations surrounding separation with Saira Banu

No anti-government sentiment in Kerala, claims CM Vijayan

Jaiswal’s Perth Simulation: 200 overs in 2 days, inclined concrete slab, lighter synthetic balls

PCB says no meeting with ICC, BCCI officials on November 26 to resolve CT imbroglio

Australia coach McDonald surprised about behaviour of wicket on Day two

Sharad Pawar: Assembly poll rout raises question of existence for patriarch’s political legacy

Related Articles More

Women centric schemes game-changer for Maharashtra, Jharkhand?

No anti-government sentiment in Kerala, claims CM Vijayan

Maharashtra poll results unexpected, incomprehensible: Uddhav Thackeray

Delhi Police constable stabbed to death in Govindpuri, one held

BJP snatches one Lok Sabha seat from Congress; Maharashtra win boosts Rajya Sabha majority prospects

MUST WATCH

Prakash Belawadi

Naxal Leader Vikram Gowda

Christmas Cake Fruit Mixing

DK Shivakumar

Rose Cultivation


Latest Additions

Puttur: Two arrested for misconduct under influence of drugs

Kaup: Massive campaign and awareness rally Nov 26 for Constitution protection

Never entered into pact to operate airport in Kenya: Adani

Women centric schemes game-changer for Maharashtra, Jharkhand?

AR Rahman sends notice to ‘slanderers’ over speculations surrounding separation with Saira Banu

Thanks for visiting Udayavani

You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.
To continue reading, please turn it off or whitelist Udayavani.